Type 4 verb suffix
There is only one
Type 4 verb suffix, indicating cause
. It can only be attached to
verbs. The suffix is
-moH. The somewhat awkward English translation may contain the phrase "cause to..." or "cause to be..." but most of the time there is a completely new word.
Basics
The relative ordering of the suffixes must always be followed. This means that even while the word
ghojmoH is translated as a new word in English ("teach"), in Klingon it still is a
verb +
suffix. When a suffix of a lower
suffix class - i.e.
Type 2 or
Type 3 - is added, they must preced the suffix
-moH. For some students this may look strange at first "breaking up" the word
ghoj-nIS-moH, but once you got used to it, any other order just looks very wrong.
-moH does not require an
object of any kind. Its description says simply that it means the
subject is causing something. It doesn't say anything about objects. All it means is that the subject causes the verb instead of doing the verb. Some of the canon examples back up the idea that an object is not necessary.
Canon Examples
SeymoH QeH |
Anger excites. |
TKW, p. 196 |
maghoSchoHmoHneS'a' |
May we execute a course (to some place)? |
TKD, chapter 4.2.10 |
Simple Examples
take form |
chen |
➞ |
create |
chenmoH |
"cause to take form" |
learn |
ghoj |
➞ |
teach |
ghojmoH |
"cause to learn" |
be frozen |
taD |
➞ |
freeze |
taDmoH |
"cause to be frozen" |
Adjectives
Using
-moH with
adjectives is easy and very clear. The subject changes the condition of the object:
open (be open) |
poS |
open (cause to be open) |
poSmoH |
Worf opens the door. |
lojmIt poSmoH wo'rIv. |
hot |
tuj |
make hot, heaten |
tujmoH |
I heat up the food. |
Soj vItujmoH. |
Problems
When used with a verb that does not have an object (like the
adjectival verbs above), the meaning is clear, as in
lojmIt vIpoSmoH "I cause the door to be open" or
puq vIQongmoH "I cause the child to sleep". The problem appears when a verb which can take an object is used. If the subject of the root sentence becomes the object of the verb with
-moH, then there are now two objects in the sentence, like "Worf teaches you Klingon". Which object should the prefix match? And if the sentence is "I teach my son Klingon", which object should appear in the object position and where do you place the other object?
We do have one
canon example that give us some indication. One of the
SkyBox cards has the sentence
ghaHvaD quHDaj qawmoH "[It is] a reminder of his heritage", indicating that the object which would have been the subject of the root verb might be treated as an
indirect object (i.e. it is marked with
-vaD). If we follow the pattern of this one example, we might create sentences like,
SoHvaD tlhIngan Hol ghojmoH wo'rIv "Worf teaches you Klingon",
puqloDwI'vaD tlhIngan Hol vIghojmoH "I teach my son Klingon", or perhaps even
jIHvaD tlhIngan Hol vIghojmoH "I teach myself Klingon."
Some experienced Klingon speakers reject this pattern and suggest that one example is not sufficient evidence. Lacking enough
canon examples, we must either live with the ambiguity or avoid the construction entirely.
See also
Type |
Sort |
Suffixes |
1 |
Oneself/one another |
-chuq, -'egh |
2 |
Volition/predisposition |
-nIS, -qang, -rup, -beH, -vIp |
3 |
Change |
-choH, -qa' |
4 |
Cause |
-moH |
5 |
Indefinite subject/ability |
-lu', -laH |
6 |
Qualification |
-chu', -bej, -ba', -law' |
7 |
Aspect |
-pu', -ta', -taH, -lI' |
8 |
Honorific |
-neS |
9 |
Syntactic markers |
-DI', -chugh, -pa', -vIS, -mo', -bogh, -meH, -'a', -jaj, -wI', -ghach |
R |
Rovers |
-Ha', -Qo', -be', -qu' |
References
: